Toward Cybersecurity Standards for Digital Evidence at the ICC

James Robert Quick

I. International Criminal Justice Has Entered the Digital Evidence Era Without Digital Forensics Standards

The International Criminal Court has modernized the collection of evidence faster than it has modernized the authentication of evidence. That gap, between enthusiastic embrace of digital submission infrastructure and an underdeveloped framework for forensic-grade verification, has become one of the most consequential unresolved problems in contemporary international criminal procedure. Wars are now documented through smartphones, satellite imagery, Telegram channels, and open-source investigations of a sophistication unimaginable a decade ago; the Office of the Prosecutor receives hundreds of thousands of digital submissions annually through platforms built for the task. And, working with Eurojust, the Office of the Prosecutor has issued guidance to civil society organizations for documenting those crimes. The evidentiary framework governing those submissions, however, remains substantially anchored in assumptions developed for an analog world.

Continue reading

Code of War: How AI Firms Are Rewriting the Rules of War and what that means for International Criminal Law


Efthimia (Mariefaye) Bechrakis, Esq.

On March 26, 2026, a federal judge blocked the Pentagon from branding Anthropic a “supply chain risk.” The ruling does more than grant an early legal victory for Anthropic. It exposes a deeper structural shift in how the boundaries of military power are being negotiated at a moment when contemporary warfare is increasingly mediated by Artificial intelligence.  For International Criminal Law (ICL), this shift raises a more fundamental question: who bears responsibility when the conditions under which force is exercised are shaped, not on the battlefield, but upstream, through privately designed systems?

Continue reading

Synthetic Abuse, Real Harm: Closing the International Law Gap on AI-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material

By Mariefaye (Efthimia) Bechrakis, Esq.

Introduction

Generative AI is often praised for its many transformative benefits across various fields, including that of law and human rights. The dual -use nature of the technology, however, has produced urgent harms, most notably the rapid rise of AI-generated synthetic child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Reports of AI generated images sexualizing children skyrocketed from roughly 4,700 in 2023 to 440,000 in the first half of 2025, while confirmed illegal AI-generated videos jumped from just two to over 1,200 in the same period. According to UNICEF, at least 1.2 million children across 11 countries disclosed having their images manipulated into sexually explicit deepfakes in the past year.

Continue reading